Play the Players

Recent responses to our first post to Seeking Alpha questioned whether Block Trader forecasts had useful predictive value. We wouldn’t have been maintaining them on a daily basis for the past decade if they didn’t.

Our principal interest is in identifying specific investment opportunities, not having market environment discussions. Still, with a backdrop of over 5 million price range forecasts, the potential for useful information exists.

But that overall equity market is subject to such a diversity of influences and changing circumstances, getting any useful handle on it is a task beyond nearly everyone, including us and our sources – who may be the best informed players in the business.

Instead, we prefer to find time-disciplined, defined-size, price swing situations in specific investments that have evidence of fairly reliable prior forecasts. We limit ourselves to time horizons that have reasonable chance to be foreseen, usually 3-6 months.

We get our forecasts from the way that market professionals protect themselves as they compete by taking necessary at-risk positions in stocks and ETFs. Their hedging activities are committed, forward-looking forecasts of what they believe can happen.

Here is a picture of how they saw prospects for XBI, the S&P Biotech SPDR, during the past two years:

In this chart the vertical lines are forecasts of prices to come, not records of prices past. The colors suggest investment traffic signals available at the time.

A simple, but useful guide is to consider the range top of a forecast as a sell target for a buy made at that date. The target should be kept specific to the buy, and not changed, despite subsequent events.

You say that’s not the way it’s done? Not what you’ve been taught?

Suppose you chose to buy the XBI in early April, 2008 at $50 because the biotech industry’s future then looked very bright. Damn! Were you smart – for a while.

Doing what you were taught, you held it for the “long term.” Maybe not so smart. Because here you are a year and a half later at $52 with only a 3% annual rate of gain.

Using the traffic signals instead, and reading rough estimates from the chart, you could have had (April’08)Buy@50-Sell@60, (October’08)Buy@50-Sell@57, (March’09)Buy@43-Sell@51 for gains of $10, $7, and $8; $25 instead of $2. And have had your capital available for other use perhaps 1/3^rd of the time.

With no sickening lose-a-third-of-your-money drops from $69 to $43.

This is shorter time horizon active investing, not day trading. You would have made three transactions in a year and a half, not an hour and a half. Holding periods averaged four months, not four hours — or four years.

The market-makers don’t want or intend to hold any position four months. But they can probably anticipate most of the price-moving conditions in the next 3 or 4 months. They just don’t know for sure when any of them might occur. So their uncertainty has to include them all, even if their positions are eliminated in 4 days.

Just try and anticipate what any company is likely to really earn in 4 years, let alone what their capital structure (number of shares) may be and what their auditors will allow them to report. And correctly guess what the market conditions will be like out there in time, and you might know what your return on investment will be.

Duplicate that effort for all of the candidates you might speculate in so that comparisons can be made, and, voila, you’re a long-term investor (?).

There’s a reason that America’s Cup sailboat skippers sail all those short tacks. That way the competition doesn’t get away from them if the wind shifts temporarily in their favor.

Our Approach ETF Investing, investment strategy

We say yes, and here’s why.

We derive forecasts from the hedging actions of the block trading community on over 2,000 widely-held and actively-traded stocks, ADRs, and ETFs. The common denominators of upside and downside price move potentials are present in all of the forecasts. The uncertainty involved in each is indicated by combining the up and down.

Those common denominators let us aggregate expectation descriptors for the equity market as a whole, or for any subset of interest. To put the overall market in a picture many stock investors can relate to, we took the recent price history of the S&P500 index, and expanded it to embrace the daily average upside and downside expectations of our entire population.

What appears immediately is the way fears and hopes expand the range of expectations when the market is rapidly and substantially declining. Less obvious, but also present is the “What, me worry?” attitude of investors in rising markets. Then the range of uncertainty shrinks.

These effects are more apparent in the following picture:

In the 2008 May-July market decline downside concerns widened only a bit, while upside hopes stayed high. Those hopes were modestly rewarded by a market rally into September. But as declines began again the downside apprehensions expanded and then mushroomed into a panic, along with plunging prices.

The convictions of optimists are hard to kill off, fortunately, so upside potentials widened appropriately for many stocks, expanding that dimension’s average.

While the market stabilized as year-end approached, the downside fears subsided back to earlier levels. But more bad news lay ahead, and further market declines into early March of this year repeated prior investor responses. Still, they were not as extreme as before.

Nor were they in early July as a month’s worth of declining market index numbers tested investors’ convictions. Then downside expectations did not expand much, and the market rejoined the recovery path.

Now the question turns to can it continue? Is it “what, me worry?” time?

That attitude may have started to appear in early September when downside concerns greatly diminished. They were accompanied by reduced upside convictions, and the level of blue-line uncertainty dropped to a level not seen in over a year.

The following couple of weeks’ pullback shook off the complacency, and once more the raised levels of concern were less severe on the downside than previously. But so were the enthusiasms of the upside. Yet uncertainty remains in a healthy range.

Looking back at the first chart, the S&P500 index price continues to be accompanied by upward trending lows and solid to up-trending highs. Behavior of the lows is most encouraging. Our conclusion is that the overall recovery continues, showing no signs that investors are likely to precipitate a serious downturn, absent the introduction of some new momentous disruptive event.

That appears to be a direct parallel as block traders are hedging their at-risk positions when filling trades in SPY, the S&P 500 SPDR. Their current forecasts are for a range of $104 to $118, +8 ½% on the upside, and – 4 ½% on the downside.

Over the past five years 129 forecasts with similar upside to downside proportions, or better, have seen higher SPY prices in 2/3rds of the days of the following 3 months, averaging +16%, and lower prices in the other 1/3^rd, averaging -14%. Buy and 3-month hold gains outweighed losses 1.9 to 1. SPY now ranks better on a reward-to-risk scale than 74% of the 2,000+ issues we follow.

Peter Way Associates has no present investments in SPY.

Recent News Market Forecasts

Today’s comment is a quick look at specific ETFs – what may be appealing, what may not – right now.  Our guides, as usual, are the Block Desk and Prop Trade Desk guys at the bulge bracket investment banks, according to the bets they are making.

Where there is volume, SKF the leveraged (2x) inverse (short) of financial stocks is their best odds-on play, but it’s a modest chance (65-35 odds) on a big gain (21%) that might include a -12% drawdown from cost along the way.

Not what you’re looking for?  Next best bet of the moment (with market liquidity) is SLV, i-Shares in silver.  They offer about the same odds with less volatility (+10%, -6%) and about half the odds-on payoff experience of SKF.  It falls just under our minimum return hurdle of 5% in 3 months.

Now if you’re willing to work in something that typically only trades 200,000 shares a day, then IAU, the COMEX gold iShares may appeal.  They present a very high odds for a +10% 3-month gain with only a -1% downside history.  Here history is the rub.  These ETFs have only 9 months of trading for us to track, and only a dozen days with forecasts as good as today’s.  Evolving experience may not be as favorable.

An alternative in the less-liquid-trading camp at this date is PIN, the Powershares India ETF.  More history for us to work from (year and a half) but it is back to the mediocre gain-loss odds (63-37) for big potential price swings (+23%, -12%), like SKF.

Sorry, but right now there are no stamp-your-foot, pound-on-the-table screaming buy opportunities.  Better to keep your powder dry.  Check in tomorrow or later in the week, and we’ll see if something better appears.

Uncategorized